Best Way to Explain What and Who is Satoshi Files: Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn
Zooko Wilcox-O’Hearn, an American computer scientist and cryptographer, was born Bryce Wilcox; after marriage, he and his wife double-barrelled their surnames, and he began going as Zooko in college.
Zooko was born and raised in Boulder, Colorado, at the foot of the Rocky Mountains. Zooko’s family moved to Texas when he was five years old, where his father, a computer scientist, worked on the TI-99/4, one of the earliest personal computers ever built. When the computers were done, Zooko’s father took one home to show his sons how to use it.
To begin with, Zooko and his brothers were only able to enter meaningless BASIC code onto the computer. However, as time passed, they began to study Logo, an educational programming language specifically created for children. “You could draw colorful shapes and then script them to fly around the screen, changing, animate, and bounce.”
“They feed off each other,” he told Forbes.
The Wilcox family subsequently relocated to Colorado Springs for Zooko’s father’s work again. While his father worked in the defense industry, Zooko discovered online bulletin message boards where he could discuss computers, technology, and the newly developed internet with other geeks and tech aficionados.
After finishing high school, Zooko intended to follow in his father’s footsteps and become a computer scientist. He chose to study computer science at the University of Colorado in Boulder, which is where he first became aware of the Cypherpunks.
Become a member of the Cypherpunks
The Cypherpunks are a group of cryptographers who investigate how encryption and other privacy tools might affect social and political change. Satoshi Nakamoto, the originator of Reusable Proof-of-Work (RPoW), and Adam Back, who invented the Hashcash function used by both Hal Finney’s RPoW and Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin, were among the group’s members. And, of course, Zooko himself.
The Cypherpunks concentrated on digital currencies such as Satoshi’s Bitcoin, Wei Dai’s b-money, and David Chaum’s Ecash, as well as private communication tools that encrypt data and allow users to communicate anonymously. Zooko first went by the alias he now goes by as a Cypherpunk. Years later, Zooko reflected on how his talks with fellow Cypherpunks assisted him in “imagining technological developments having social implications.”impact… that technology would alter the way entire human communities interacted with one another.
In the mid-1990s, David Chaum, an American computer scientist and Cypherpunk, shared his ideas for ‘untraceable digital cash’ on the Cypherpunks mailing list. Zooko phoned Chaum after reading the message to ask whether he needed help with the project. After Chaum agreed to hire him, Zooko took a leave of absence from his studies to work on Chaum’s DigiCash project.
Chaum assigned Zooko the responsibility of determining how to decentralize DigiCash. Unfortunately, despite recognizing on the job that DigiCash’s centralization was a thorn in its side, Zooko was unable to devise a workable solution. What the world actually needed, according to Zooko, was digital money that didn’t rely on a third party to settle conflicts from the center.
DigiCash
Eventually, the company dissolved. According to a few former employees, the fundamental reason for its collapse was centralization: the large banks did not trust a currency managed by a single company that sat in the middle and had total authority. This problem was not solved until many years later, when Satoshi invented Bitcoin.
Zooko worked as a developer at Mojo Nation, a P2P file-sharing firm akin to BitTorrent, after DigiCash went out of business. Mojo included several capabilities that Satoshi would later add to Bitcoin, including as the capacity to digitally represent unique goods, or “tokenization.” Zooko persisted at Mojo in her search for a solution to the centralization problem that had hampered all previous attempts at building a digital currency.
Participation in Bitcoin
Satoshi distributed the Bitcoin whitepaper to Zooko and the other Cypherpunks in October 2008. It had exactly what Zooko was searching for: a digital currency that solved DigiCash’s centralization issues.
Although he did not engage on development, Zooko was one of the first Cypherpunks to become associated with Bitcoin. Instead, he helped spread the word about Bitcoin and its potential: he was the first person to blog about Bitcoin in January 2009. He was sure from then on that Bitcoin would be a smashing success.
In 2015, he even tweeted at Nobel laureates in economics, pleading with them to persuade him that buying in Bitcoin at $4.50 was a bad idea. In retrospect, buying Bitcoin at $4.50 was definitely a great investment considering its all-time high of nearly $1,000.
$70,000. The majority of people, however, did not agree with Zooko at the time; they believed Bitcoin would only be used by criminals wanting to conceal their unlawful cash and that it would either fade away or be crushed by regulators.
Zooko announced the ‘Tahoe’ least-authority file system shortly after Satoshi published the Bitcoin whitepaper: an open-source, safe, and decentralized file system that distributed files over a peer network. Each peer on the network can exchange data with other peers, and the network continues to function even if some of the peers are unavailable, broken, or malicious. The general public license, or GPL, of the application allows users to execute, inspect, distribute, and modify the code.
Making Zcash
Zooko aided a range of enterprises in the software development process between 2010 and 2015. He worked on ZRTP, a cryptographic technology for VoIP call encryption, and he was a SimpleGeo and Mnet network developer. Then, in 2013, Zooko launched Zcash, his most major professional venture to date.
In 2014, a Johns Hopkins University cryptographer called Matthew Green approached Zooko and requested for his help in developing a new cryptocurrency that was both as decentralized as Bitcoin and ensured its users’ anonymity. Green planned for Zcash to disguise information such as who was paying whom and how much.
Both pro- and anti-crypto groups are divided on the question of privacy. Privacy currencies, according to their critics, would
usher in a golden age of money laundering in which criminal groups and rogue countries may transfer their unlawful funds without interference from tax officials, governmental agencies, or the police.
Privacy proponents, on the other hand, argue that ordinary people want and deserve privacy, and that a demand for privacy does not inevitably imply crime. Furthermore, even before Bitcoin, the super-rich had no trouble escaping taxes: some estimates suggest that up to $36 trillion is hidden away abroad, with almost none of it being cryptocurrency.
Zcash, however, is more than just a privacy coin. Nobody, including the authorities, can prevent others from sending or receiving unlawful transactions online because it is completely anonymous. Naturally, the legality of Zcash was not completely known at the time.
It was being worked on. Zooko was aware of the dangers before becoming involved. He told his wife the week before development began that it was terrifying. “I could end up in jail.” I may be assassinated or extorted. I might go bankrupt. It may have crushed me in some way. But it’s far too vital to ignore.”
Most venture capitalists and investors who heard about Zcash, like Zooko, were skeptical of the idea of an untraceable privacy coin. Many of them predicted that this would result in legal issues in the future. But Zooko and the other developers were adamant about winning them over.
Zooko and the team collaborated in 2015 to pitch a group of investors.
They used their finances to travel to California for a pitch meeting. Unfortunately, the investors mocked Zooko and Matthew Green and laughed them out of the room. Despite this bad start, they were able to gather approximately $700,000 in a subsequent round of fundraising, as well as an additional $2 million later that year. Zooko and Green began working on the Zcash project with that money in the bank.
Zcash operates in an astonishingly unusual manner. It conceals the sender, receiver, and amount of each transaction by employing “zero-knowledge proofs.” This is in contrast to Bitcoin, which records all transactions in a public ledger. A zero-knowledge proof establishes the truth of a proposition without divulging any specific information about it.
It’s similar in several aspects.
entails tearing a hole in a sheet of paper and covering Waldo’s face in a Where’s Waldo puzzle to demonstrate your knowledge of Waldo’s whereabouts without revealing any additional information about the problem or Waldo himself.
As a result, the primary distinction between Bitcoin and Zcash is anonymity. This distinction, according to Zooko and Green, is analogous to that between http and https: the latter is significantly more private and secure than the former. However, there is one significant difference: mining.
One of Bitcoin’s major drawbacks is that when the network grows, in order to have any chance of successfully mining it, you’d need to fill entire warehouses with hundreds of GPUs or ASIC miners. This is both costly and energy-intensive.
However, because Zcash mining relies on RAM rather than CPUs, the entry barrier is far lower. In fact, you can mine Zcash with a laptop.
While working on Zcash, Zooko founded Least Authority, a security auditing service that helped its clients avoid the unintentional revelation of private or confidential information. Unfortunately, the business did not take off straight immediately, and in order to live, Zooko slept in his car in a parking lot every night.
Nonetheless, Zcash acquired reputation and value quickly, which probably aided Zooko in finding more accommodating lodgings. However, many of the early news pieces written on Zcash were not quite complimentary.
Zcash did not solve the problem that some people hoped it would.
were Bitcoin’s more “serious” concerns, namely its scalability, therefore it wasn’t commonly regarded as a big advance over Bitcoin. Many people, as expected, condemned the currency and its architects for providing a means for criminals to conceal their illegal income. The news was rife with allegations that Zcash was corrupt. Eventually, Zooko went so far as to hire an outside group to undertake research on whether Zcash was widely used by criminal organizations. The investigators discovered that only 1% of illicit merchants accepted Zcash, compared to 60% who accepted Bitcoin.
However, this does not mean that Zcash is never used for illegal purposes; rather, such occurrences are uncommon. Zooko was understandably upset when the study was published.alleviated. He used it to demonstrate that illicit transactions are not the same as anonymous transactions.
The Proof That Zooko Wilcox O’Hearn Is Satoshi Nakamoto
He possesses technical abilities.
Zooko’s father taught him how to use a computer at a young age, and he hasn’t stopped using them since. Zooko’s deep knowledge of programming and cryptography, as well as his work on Zcash and DigiCash, illustrate his technical prowess and imply that he may have been instrumental in the creation of Bitcoin.
He’s a cryptographer.
Zooko became involved in various arguments concerning sophisticated themes such as encryption and new digital currencies after learning about the Cypherpunks in college. Perhaps before adopting the moniker “Satoshi Nakamoto,” Satoshi joined the Cypherpunk mailing list using his real name. Could Zooko be the name?
An Unusual T-Shirt
When Fortune Magazine interviewed Zooko, he wore a t-shirt that read, “My name is Satoshi Nakamoto.” Was this a sly joke? Or is it a deft double bluff?
The Proof That Zooko Wilcox O’Hearn Isn’t Satoshi Nakamoto
When Satoshi was developing Bitcoin, he was quite busy.
When Satoshi was inventing Bitcoin, Zooko was working for Mojo Nation, a P2P file-sharing firm comparable to BitTorrent. Did he have time to do both?
Inadequate Direct Evidence Pointing to Him
Unlike some of the other hypotheses, there is little direct evidence that Zooko is Satoshi; the majority of the evidence is contextual.
He Claims Not to Be Satoshi.
Zooko denies being Satoshi and frequently refers to Satoshi as a distinct individual. “I don’t think of myself as a pioneer, like Satoshi,” he explained. “I see myself more as a conduit for other people’s inventions, including Satoshi’s.”
About The Author
